Epistemic debt is the gap between what an organization believes to be true and what is actually true, compounded over time by the cost of acting on that gap. It rarely announces itself. These twelve questions go looking for it.
Pick one team, process or area you know well, and answer for that — not for “the company.” It takes about three minutes. Your answers stay in your browser; nothing is sent anywhere. It works even better run together with the people who depend on the same decisions: the questions you disagree on are findings in themselves.
Your result
Where to start
How the Score Works
Each answer is worth 0, 1 or 2 points: the first answer to every question is 0, the second 1, the third 2. The total runs from 0 to 24, and each of the four areas from 0 to 6.
- 0–6: Maintained. Beliefs here get checked, and the reasoning behind them survives. Run the audit again when the team or the tools change.
- 7–14: Accruing. Normal for an area that has been running well for a while: some beliefs have quietly gone unchecked. Fix the gaps below before they compound.
- 15–24: Compounding. Decisions are resting on beliefs nobody can currently verify. Start with the assumptions; everything downstream depends on them.
"Where to start" lists the questions you scored highest on, with one concrete step for each. Nothing you select leaves your browser.
Going Further
- What Is Epistemic Debt? — the definition, what it is not, and how it accumulates
- From Epistemic Debt to Epistemic Instrumentation — building systems that surface uncertainty instead of hiding it
- Measuring Epistemic Debt — what recorded tool calls reveal when you try to quantify it
Free to use and share. Please keep the attribution: Epistemic Debt Self-Audit, WBA Research, wbaconsulting.org.